All parties claim to be independent of each other, CAFCASS claim to have the welfare of the child as their paramount priority. So how can a guardian who has had little or no contact with a child conclude that a child is better of in foster care and be able to persuade a judge to order the removal of a child from its loving mother and extended family.
CAFCASS and family courts are in collusion together, they have one agenda, and that is to have healthy children, removed from loving mothers and fathers and adopted for profit. They clearly are not independent of each other.
An interesting read; Click here