All parties claim to be independent of each other, CAFCASS claim to have the welfare of the child as their paramount priority. So how can a guardian who has had little or no contact with a child conclude that a child is better of in foster care and be able to persuade a judge to order the removal of a child from its loving mother and extended family.
CAFCASS and family courts are in collusion together, they have one agenda, and that is to have healthy children, removed from loving mothers and fathers and adopted for profit. They clearly are not independent of each other.
An interesting read; Click here
Advertisements
CAFCASS and family courts have one agenda is to take the child in all cases , remove the child/s from loving mothers and fathers and adopted well out of sight, we need to do this to keep our hghly paid jobs, no children no work.
LikeLike
100% agreed with this comment, identical in my case, 2hrs of seeing my children. Useless git! #Mark Kar……. foreign name
LikeLike