Stolen By Cheshire West


image

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Stolen By Cheshire West

  1. This inhumane cruelty by the UKs Government carried out by certain social services workers especially dealing in children services, has to stop, there are many victims today their lives completely destroyed even their children, by what I see as ongoing acts of evilness, there will be many more victims in the near future if these crimes against humanity are not stopped. Every case I read and they are sad desperate good parent/s telling the same story about, Social Services workers, the lies against them, colluded together, false statements in court with no proof children or child being abused, child/s stolen on Social services evidence of, might, could ,we think, perhaps, possible, that’s their only evidence and a child is taken from their loving home, so wrong this injustice. . .

    Like

  2. Forced adoptions in UK do not comply with ECHR Art.8 which allows the baby to be taken into care in order to protect the health of the child. But once the baby is in care the baby’s health is now protected. Adoption is sponsored by social services in order to promote the future health of the child. The future health of the child is a legitimate government interest But ECHR Art.8 does not allow dissolution of the legal baby-mother family in order to PROMOTE the future health of the child. Only to protect its present health.
    The government has balanced the interests of the child to have its health PROMOTED (as contrasted with protected from a proximate danger) against the human rights of the parent. The child’s rights are paramount over those of the parent when they are of equal standing. But if a right that is not protected under ECHR or UDR then it never has priority over a right that is protected under ECHR. Which means that a forced adoption is void ab initio.
    It will take a lawsuit all the way to the EctHR to establish this. It should be done.

    Like

    1. Henry you say Adoption is sponsored by social services in order to promote the future health of the child. The future health of the child is a legitimate government interest. But what happens when its found out that social services GOVERMENT run organization abuses children in their so called care. or does that not come under the rules of children and care. Two words they use to carry out their acts of what I see evil.

      Like

  3. Por thing….so beautiful …I wonder why SS stolen from her mother….profit….blond childreans with a blue eyes are like caviar on the rich table….bastardis

    Like

Join in the discussion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s