Journal columnist and TV personality Denise Robertson on the heartbreak and unfairness that is all too common in the legal system. Last week a grandmother wrote: “My only hope now is a miracle, which is unlikely, as since this happened to my family I have met so many innocent parents and grandparents who have lost their children to forced adoption. Why do the courts, who are supposed to protect us and make sure justice is done, ignore us.” Read more, click here
Do many UK adults have dyslexia?
Britain has two million severely dyslexic individuals, of which some 1,625,000 are adults. Some of the world´s most successful people are dyslexic, including Bill Gates (the founder of Microsoft), Richard Branson (the Virgin Boss), and Thomas Edison (the inventor).
What is dyslexia?
Put simply, dyslexia is a disorder which can cause difficulties in spelling, reading and writing. Dyslexia can affect people in different ways. Visual dyslexia may result in number and letter reversals and the inability to write symbols in the correct sequence, while auditory dyslexia involves difficulty with the sounds of letters or groups of letters. Dyslexia can also affect memory.
While dyslexia is classified as both a learning and reading disability, it is more commonly referred to as a Specific Learning Disability.
Does dyslexia qualify as a disability?
Not necessarily. Under the Equality Act 2010, for a condition to be considered a disability it has to be a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on your ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.
It may be that your dyslexia does not affect you to this extent in normal day-to-day life, but most people find court proceedings stressful, and those stresses can exacerbate dyslexia and how it affects you. We advise being cautious, and if you have any concerns that your dyslexia may cause you difficulties with any aspect of court proceedings, we recommend you inform the court that you have a disability (even if it is not normally so profound that it affects you in normal life).
Be aware that you are likely to be asked to look at written evidence during court proceedings, will be questioned, and that a judge may misinterpret hesitation or poor recollection of events as an attempt to mislead the court. It is far better to be cautious and inform the court of your dyslexia from the outset.
While your dyslexia may not count as a disability under the Equality Act 2010, you do have the right to a fair hearing under the Human Rights Act 1998.
What should I do to ensure a fair hearing?
For most applications to the family court, you need to complete Form C100. On page 9 of that form, section 11 asks if you or any of the parties involved have a disability for which you require special assistance or special facilities. That form provides very little space for you to set out what reasonable adjustments and assistance you need the court to grant you. To assist you, we have provided a list of measures which may assist you and there is no reason why you cannot attach to the Form C100 court application form. You can download our suggested list of reasonable adjustments by clicking on Dyslexia, the Courts and Reasonable Adjustments.
We also recommend you consider asking that there be a pre-trial directions hearing, where you can discuss what support you need with the judge. Our document Dyslexia, the Courts and Reasonable Adjustments includes this request.
Do not underestimate how stressful court proceedings may be, and the effect of that stress on you. If you have dyslexia, we strongly recommend you include this on the application form. While you may normally feel it inappropriate to refer to dyslexia as a disability, in these circumstances, we recommend you do.
If you are the respondent…
If you are the respondent (you are not the person who has applied to the court), you or your solicitor will be served with paperwork notifying you of the court case.
In these circumstances you (or your solicitor) will be asked to complete Form C7 which is the acknowledgment of service.
On page 3 of that form, section 7 asks if you have a disability for which you require special assistance or special facilities. That form provides very little space for you to set out what reasonable adjustments and assistance you need the court to give you. To assist you, we have provided a list of measures which may assist you and there is no reason why you cannot attach this to the Form C7. You can download our suggested list of reasonable adjustments by clicking on Dyslexia, the Courts and Reasonable Adjustments.
We also recommend you consider asking that there be a pre-trial directions hearing, where you can discuss what support you need with the judge. Our document �Dyslexia, the Courts and Reasonable Adjustments´ includes this request.
A right to a fair hearing
Under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, you have the right to a fair trial in court. It is however important, if you suffer from dyslexia, that you ask the court to make �reasonable adjustments´ so you do not face disadvantage.
I am using a solicitor, what should I tell them?
We recommend you print, complete and hand them a copy of “Dyslexia, the Courts and Reasonable Adjustments” which you can download from the gold button labelled “Our Dyslexia and Court Package” at the bottom of this page.
If you suspect that your dyslexia may cause you a problem in court, we recommend that your solicitor completes this form with you, and attaches it to the C100 court form (if you are the applicant) or the C7 form (if you are the respondent).
We also recommend you print and hand your solicitor a copy of The Good Practice Guide for Justice Professionals published by the Dyslexia Association.
I cannot afford a solicitor, what can I do?
You can represent yourself, but be aware court cases often require you to manage large quantities of paperwork, and deal with large amounts of information. If you can afford a solicitor, or qualify for legal aid, we recommend using the services of a solicitor experienced in helping people with dyslexia.
If are not using a solicitor, we recommend you have someone accompany you into court. Ideally, they should have experience of court proceedings.
Please also refer to our section on McKenzie Friends.
What do judges think of unrepresented dyslexics? click to collapse contents
The opinion will vary from judge to judge, and it is important you make them aware that you have dyslexia or else they may misread hesitation as your seeking to mislead the court or being disingenuous in some way.
Many judges (and solicitors and lay advisors for that matter) are ignorant of how dyslexia affects people, especially when they are under stress. We cannot overstate how important it is that you make the court aware of your dyslexia and also provide them with copies of The Good Practice Guide for Justice Professionals published by the Dyslexia Association. You should also ask if the judge is aware of sections 5.5 and 5.6 of the Judicial Studies Board´s Equal Treatment Bench Book which sets out guidance for the judiciary on specific learning difficulties.
With regard to being a litigant-in-person with dyslexia, the Equal Treatment Bench Book gives the following guidance to judges:
“Representing oneself is highly inadvisable for people with Specific Learning Difficulties. The difficulties of doing so should be made clear, and information on legal advice provided. If the individual still decides to go ahead, clear written guidelines should be provided on court procedures and terminology. The presence of a McKenzie Friend in civil or family proceedings should be encouraged in order to help locate information, prompt as necessary during the questioning of witnesses, and provide the opportunity for brief discussion of issues as they arise. Witness Intermediaries may also work with people with Specific Learning Difficulties and it may not be necessary to restrict this to criminal cases” [Equal Treatment Bench Book, section 5.5.4, Judicial Studies Board]
High Court judge likens treatment of father by the Family Court to the storyline of Franz Kafka’s The
Trial. Read more, click here.
This is happening all over the UK in every family court. Children deprived of one or both natural parents.
Traffic, the film they want to ban. Traffic 2 coming very soon.
Watch the FULL version below. Like and share this video
Welcome to Child Care Proceedings Exposed. This website has been started by a group of concerned people who have had first-hand experience of child care proceedings. What is happening in family courts all across the country is fundamentally wrong and has no place in English law.
Miscarriages of justice are taking place on a daily basis in secret family courts. Judges, solicitors, barristers, social worker and guardians collude together to remove healthy children from loving parents based on false allegations of harm, or the risk of future emotional harm.
Human rights are being breached on a daily basis.
Article 3 – No torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. The prohibition on torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is one of the most important provisions in the Human Rights Act.
Article 6 – right to a fair hearing. The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy itself.
Article 7 – No punishment without law Article 7 provides that:
- No-one can be found guilty of a crime that was not a crime under the law at the time it was committed – the prohibition on retrospective criminalisation; and
- Anyone found guilty of a criminal offence cannot have a heavier penalty imposed on him or her than that which was applicable at the time the offence was committed.
Article 8 – Right to a private and family life. Everyone has the right to respect for his of her private and family life, home and correspondence.
From the moment the child is identified as adoptable, the social services move in for the kill. Vulnerable and frightened parents are like lambs to the slaughter, and once the social services have got their teeth in, they are not prepared to let go, even when they know they have got it wrong.
Nothing is left to chance when it comes to achieving the final goal of having a child taken for adoption, the lengths they will go to will leave you astounded, shocked and in a state of disbelief. They use parent’s lack of knowledge and access to information and legal help to push for adoption, the biggest weapon is the use of fear.
It is all done in the name of ‘child protection’, and whilst it is agreed children need protecting from any form of harm and/or abuse, what is happening is not identifying children who need protecting, it is about identifying children who can be easily adopted.
Please feel free to add your thoughts and comment, all comments are moderated, so trolls and hate messages will be deleted.