You Do Not Own Your Children

YOUR Council is turning you over and robbing you blind…“There is no “application” for a Birth Certificate. The Council creates one no matter what, with or without any parent providing information. The paper on which they provide information is called an information sheet, not an application. The parent signs only as an informant, not as any applicant. The baby is not registered at all. Only the birth event is registered which is the birthing of the new fictitious entity Name being created by the Council.

The Council then issues you a certified COPY of the original which the Council keeps as legal title to that fictitious entity Name. You merely USE the Council owned legal “person” to conduct any commerce within the Council regulated legal system of commerce, all of which is just fiction. Even when the parent signed as informant, that was not their signature they signed, but the signature for the fiction Name the State owns and created after they were born.

Everyone who has a copy of the birth certificate is authorised by the Council to USE the Council property Name and authorised to sign that Name FOR that Name. Everything you USE that Name for is all liability of the Council. It is their property. They hold original legal title to it. The only reason everyone has problems from using that Name is only because they BELIEVE that is their property. So they make CLAIMS to that Name because of merely BELIEVING that is their property which is actually a false claim they make against State owned property.

Any time a CLAIM is made in any court that claim MUST be bonded or insured. So your CLAIM becomes your CONSENT where you pledge your body and/or property as your bond/insurance as surety against your CLAIM. When you lose they take your body and put it in jail while their bond created cures or they take your property to pay your loss in court for YOUR claim which you made!

3
If you use their property Name properly and do not claim it or anything registered in that Name, then they have no consent from you and no claim by you and the State then must settle any claim against their property Name. It is as simple as that…. Any time a names has a Last Name included that is a fiction name. There is no last name for living men or women, ONLY a given name, first-middle. So unless there is ONLY a first-middle name where NO last name exists at all, then the name is not for a man or woman. It does not matter how it spelled at all. It only matters whether it includes a last name or not. That is what the difference between a name for a living being and a fiction name. You will not find a Birth Certificate that does not have a Last Name. …

In fact, no name can BE the human. The human can only be CALLED BY a name. James is the name the human would be called by. There is no last name attached. The only way to properly refer to a human by a name is where you would have write, the man called by James. Man is man and woman is woman no matter what. Man is not James. Woman is not Jane. Man is only called by James and woman is only called by Jane.

James Martin or Jane Martin is fiction and has nothing at all to do with a living man or woman …. Of course, when one actually KNOWS THYSELF, then they know all those codes and statutes and their definitions are not important at all because they know none of it applies to them anyway. They don’t even volunteer any more as a participant to that fictitious Law Society because they know that it has nothing to do with them and they are not a party to it.”

Forced Adoption

Baby stolen at birth, denied medical treatment and sustained 2 head injuries under Cardiff local authorities. We’ve been fighting an injustice 23 months. In 3 of these, you will see the head injuries, and her hair wasn’t growing (due to being laying down long periods this was ignored) it’s abuse. Forced adoption social services use future harm and we still campaign to be heard. She was the first child born and the first grandchild.transferred her to another hospital away from her family.. hundreds of families losing their children. We demand a public inquiry and apology. Allegations that are untrue and denied witness, in the secret family courts. Fabricated lies putting families through hell. The dad still denied 2 go on the birth certificate, old enough to kill in the military army (training) but not to have a family. No criminal convictions, there no drink/drugs history an only started smoking their reports and false allegations. Told to amend papers and never, on two occasions. Please subscribe and share and follow us on our campaigns and protesting. We wish you all well x

2000 children are taken every month in the UK by Social Services

2000 children are taken every month in the UK by Social Services, most of these from innocent families. My book TAKEN needs to be published to tell the story of how my 3 were taken aged 1, 3 and 5 whilst I was pregnant with the 4th. I fought to get them back – it took a year! Most never return home. Please help fund ‘TAKEN’ to be published. It is a vital gateway into Parliament, the legal system, universities and Social Services to fight to bring change.

 

Child Care Proceedings Exposed

Traffic 2, Inside Child Protection- Watch The Film ABOVE.

Welcome to Child Care Proceedings Exposed. This website has been started by a group of concerned people who have had first-hand experience of child care proceedings. What is happening in family courts all across the country is fundamentally wrong and has no place in English law.

Miscarriages of justice are taking place on a daily basis in secret family courts. Judges, solicitors, barristers, social worker and guardians collude together to remove healthy children from loving parents based on false allegations of harm, or the risk of future emotional harm.

Human rights are being breached on a daily basis.

Article 3 – No torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. The prohibition on torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is one of the most important provisions in the Human Rights Act.

Article 6 – right to a fair hearing. The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy itself.

Article 7 – No punishment without law Article 7 provides that:

  • No-one can be found guilty of a crime that was not a crime under the law at the time it was committed – the prohibition on retrospective criminalisation; and
  • Anyone found guilty of a criminal offence cannot have a heavier penalty imposed on him or her than that which was applicable at the time the offence was committed.

Article 8 – Right to a private and family life. Everyone has the right to respect for his of her private and family life, home and correspondence.

From the moment the child is identified as adoptable, the social services move in for the kill. Vulnerable and frightened parents are like lambs to the slaughter, and once the social services have got their teeth in, they are not prepared to let go, even when they know they have got it wrong.

Nothing is left to chance when it comes to achieving the final goal of having a child taken for adoption, the lengths they will go to will leave you astounded, shocked and in a state of disbelief. They use parent’s lack of knowledge and access to information and legal help to push for adoption, the biggest weapon is the use of fear.

It is all done in the name of ‘child protection’, and whilst it is agreed children need protecting from any form of harm and/or abuse, what is happening is not identifying children who need protecting, it is about identifying children who can be easily adopted.

Please feel free to add your thoughts and comment, all comments are moderated, so trolls and hate messages will be deleted.